• StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Makes some good points, mint is the closest experience you can get to windows. And one thing I think people who are getting uppity about the idea of that don’t get is, if you want more mainstream adaptation of Linux, YOU. NEED. THAT.

        I remember the story of a man trying to get his mom onto Linux and she broke down crying at one point because learning all the new things was stressful for her, completely turned her off of Linux.

        Mint isn’t for the sweaty arch-bros of the world, it’s a valuable onboarding tool for the rest of us who didn’t spend our childhood scripting shell commands to do random shit on our PC’s in grade school. IMHO, Adapt to accessibility or get the hell out of the way.

        • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I dunno, I use Garuda and it’s an Arch distro. It’s been super user friendly and I’ve only had to learn console stuff when I wanted to mess with stuff most casual users wouldn’t be bothered with.

          And maybe you would say, “well that’s not really representative of a normal Arch install” but isn’t that the point of different distros? That anyone can build on functionality to do something like make Arch more user friendly?

      • CannonGoBoom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        An update black screened his system and corrupted his time shift backups. So he gave Linux Mint a shot and has been using it for several weeks.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Could very well happen on Mint as well. Should switch to atomic, if that’s his main concern.

          • BCsven@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Mint is a good choice because it has an easy timeshift option, so a problem in an update is just a rollback/recover. Same as Snapper Rollback on distros like OpenSUSE, it means a non savvy Linux user can reboot and have it fixed. That is appealing for a lot of users that don’t want to bother with finding the fix

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              According to the previous comment, he had Time Shift but the files were corrupted.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Does ubuntu have this? Or does one need to install something to set this up

          • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            It could happen with anything, but since Mint 17.3 (2015) the only serious corruption I’ve experienced is during a major OS upgrade. I had far more problems with Windows.

      • hilliard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        nothing wrong with Mint, but it isnt some magical distro, and I’m so sick of hearing about it that my ears pretty much hear Linux Moist
        every single “What distro should I try?” thread: “Mint” “I recommend Mint” "Why use x when you could use Mint?" “MINT!”… /rant

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          It is not that it is the best distro, its that it is the easier onboarding experience for a windows user

          • hilliard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            many distros fall into that category, elementary, zorin, kubuntu, etc. mint isnt even at the top of every such list
            just seems weird. I mean, the OP is pretty much a blatant commercial. “It just works-out-of-the-box!” yeah, they kind of all do
            but mostly
            I just wanna hate on the thing everyone likes, probably. I was a punkrock kid :-)

              • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                Are you one of those ‘Systemd is bad’ type people too? I could see you making the argument that any distro that allows you to install systemd is bad, defaults be damned.

                I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic. Apologies if you were.

        • Glifted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Its bad but weirdly its the only one to get all my shit working.

          I’d like to switch back to Crunchbang++ but I was having problems running some things