Love that you put it in quotes as if to be sarcastic. Hilarious.

This is basically how the entire Internet works, but you know that from your post. Surely you also know that traffic gets “routed” from place A to B all the time without SSH as well.

So if you want to “route” a remote instance back to another place, you:

1. Set routing rules on the intended origin
2. Set default route on the remote client
3. Set restricted firewall rules so both the origin and client are allowed to talk to each other
4. Traffic is routed

Another alternative is using Tailscale and setting an exit node on your network, which is essentially the same thing.

But you already knew that, and that’s why you chimed in with your comment. Stupid me.

How fucking stupid must I look, huh?

Wut. C’mon.

If I’m reading this right, you just need to learn about routing. SSH has nothing to do with this. This is basic networking at best.

What kernel are you on?

They aren’t comparable being at completely different scales. Check https://diskprices.com/

Don’t mix your public and private DNS records. Use your public records for public things, and a local DNS forwarder for your local network.

A records only reference IPs and not ports.

SRV can be used to specify where to find ports, but the client needs to support those lookups to properly use it. You can use a reverse proxy or HTTP redirects to point things to different ports.

If it fails it’s healthcheck, then it reports unhealthy. Check and see what it’s healthcheck is configure to be.

It’s not that there’s anything inherently wrong with this, but it’s not the most in line with your goals. If you’re worried about data loss, you could have made a volume that spans both drives like RAID1/Z1, or you could have setup some clever data spanning with BTRFS or likewise. Then you’d be killing two birds with one stone for the Timeshift portion.

If you want safe backups, you need a separate backup drive at a bare minimum.

Doesn’t look like anything integrates with it yet except for something called Mastopod.

Well Nix and other immutable distros are about versioning with binary compatible layers that will be repeatable. Directory structure is already baked-in, so that’s sort of my point.

This project, from the docs at least, seemed like a week intentioned thing that has been handled and passed over in a different way.

Not to offend, but the entire premise of this distro is about directory names, which seems a bit…dated. What are the other selling points?

Not this much. Try disabling desktop effects and see if anything improves: https://userbase.kde.org/Desktop_Effects_Performance

Well my first guess is that your GPU is engaged by every single process you seem to have running. Any idea why?

What’s the output of nvidia-smi?

Does it happen with all games or GL engagement, or just the heavier ones?

What’s your memory util?

Does your machine use swap when gaming?

Are you overclocking your memory or CPU freq?

Check my second point and link.

You probably have a conflict between your power profiles and gnome settings.

Do you already have the power profile selector in your gnome panel in the top-right menu? Try switching to balanced or performance and see if it stops.

If that doesn’t help, check this out.

Not necessarily. Your OS and config may only support certain sleep states in combination with your motherboard and hardware.

I’m not seeing any swap space, so that could be it. Check this post out.

It could also be that your BIOS settings for suspend/resume aren’t set to something compatible with your existing config as well though, if the above doesn’t work, or you’re not comfortable with that level of interaction, check your BIOS first, then try the above maybe.

Is your root partition encrypted?

Give the output of lsblk if you could.

Framework