I feel like everyone suggests following hashtags, but depending on the hashtag, I find the content that’s being posted quite overwhelming when it comes to the amount of toots, and that it’s hard to get an overview. Anyone that relates?
Using hashtags+ filters mostly.
I created lists of people I want to see what they post. I look through them. I get a wide variety of content from those lists.
I also created searches by hashtag and that works for me when I want to see what people are saying about specific topics. Works great.
No, I don’t feel overwhelmed.
When I was new to Mastodon, I followed everyone who might maybe have something interesting to say (e.g. open source projects that I’ve never used but found somewhat interesting).
Right now I have 43 tabs open on my phone most of which are links from Mastodon I haven’t yet gotten around to reading… I think you can see why nowadays I tend to unfollow more things than I newly follow.
I don’t have anyone suggesting to me to follow hashtags. Just the indication that it’s a thing I can do if I want.
Given the number of hashtags I see in some posts (esp heavy hashtag users (whom I hate cause the post becomes almost unreadable)) I can certainly see the number of posts returned for any given hashtag could be instantly overwhelming.
I’ve never actually followed a hashtag so don’t have much to say about that… Other than perhaps that maybe has something to do with why I don’t feel overwhelmed on Mastodon. 🤷♂️ 🤷♂️
I just handpick and choose entities (people/news sources) to follow.
I guess I don’t understand the mastodon/twitter style feed, I’ve always found that I couldn’t seem to get a feed interesting enough to come back to.
Yeah I never cared for the format either.
This is one reason (among many, sadly) that people abandoned or never bothered with Mastodon, and chose Bluesky instead. e.g. the latter has a “Catch Up” feed, for the most popular posts from the last 24 hours (so full of AOC stuff today:-). I check this occasionally throughout the week now, even without having an account there, to know what’s going on.
But I vastly prefer the (Threadi-)Verse style of Lemmy/Mbin/PieFed. For comments, I love how they are sortable in terms of popularity of reception, rather than having to scroll endlessly through the list until you arbitrarily decide to stop. And for posts, grouped by community, although PieFed offers categories that bridge those together. So if you want News, on X/Bluesky/Mastodon I suppose you’d have to use an appropriate hashtag or follow a news-type account, while on the Verse (especially PieFed’s categories of communities) it’s just all right there together.
This is actually the beauty of the fediverse to me.
Anyone with the know-how (or will to learn) can fork some code and start implementing changes they want from their service. It’s always been one of the biggest draws of *nix for me (and FOSS in general). I love the really granular control of being able to configure pretty much every setting or feature to the users liking.
But do you need an account?
And can it grab content from other instances?
If not, Bluesky will continue to win:-(, but if so, then this should be integrated into the main branch ASAP and the word gotten out, to help keep people fleeing from X but offering a better (FOSS) alternative to Bluesky!:-)
No need for another account, since it’s log in via your Mastodon account.
As I understand it, it’s a more feature-rich alternative frontend (think like Alexandrite/Photon for Lemmy), so it’s grabbing content in the sense that any ActivityPub instance does so. So…Yes? Unless you meant in a different way.
It sounds like “maybe” and “no”.
The Bluesky “Catch Up” feed you can view as a guest, entirely anonymously without needing to createna Bluesky account first. This makes it more like Lemmy or Reddit or Mastodon, and unlike Facebook or X or Ticktock where account creation is mandatory. But if you need a Mastodon account - as your link seems to suggest - then that acts as a barrier to people checking it out prior to deciding whether to join or not, e.g. it doesn’t create a “welcoming” environment.
And Bluesky is centralized, so it doesn’t even need to pull in content from other instances, whereas Mastodon does, and unless someone has done the work for you to subscribe to something (I don’t use Mastodon so I don’t know what this would need to be: a person’s account?), it won’t be on the instance, by design.
In short, the Bluesky “Catch Up” feed just works, instantly, right away, with no extra steps needed, whereas s your link needs creation of an account, which requires first deciding on an instance, and that instance having decided to install that optional software component, and then you have to use the special link to choose that alternative front-end client, and then you need to… on and on it goes, by which point the person has long ago already switched to Bluesky.
I’m not trying to be a dick here, just explaining that there are reasons that people choose to use the products that WORK for them, yes even Reddit, and choose to avoid products that require
installation of Arch Linux btwadditional effort, like Mastodon.I follow where you’re coming from.
I can see the perks to the Bluesky option, but given it’s centralized, venture capital funded (and they’re already trying to figure out monetization), and so forth, I’m personally not inclined to rely on much related to it.
However, I’m very aware of the hurdles the option I shared present to those unfamiliar with all of this, and why they’d choose otherwise. Then again, we’re here using this stuff, I’m posting from a microblogging instance (Sharkey) to you, and so my posts are also indirectly for others on other microblogging instances (like those using Mastodon).
For anyone these replies may reach on a Mastodon instance, using Phanpy is much simpler. It’s just going to Phanpy.social, logging in with their info, and they’re set to use it. Much like someone on Lemmy can go to Phtn.app and give Photon a try.
All that said it would be preferable if there was a guest accessible version to Phanpy (or any similar catch up-style service for fediverse stuff), without a doubt.
I agree. My brief Twitter usage was following bars, restaurants, and music venues to see happy hour specials and upcoming events.
I don’t think it is that much for me, I kinda like “infinite content” what I don’t like is being bombarded with content that is not in English or Spanish… Which I clearly specified within the Mastodon settings to be my preference… So I spend most of the time navigating through said hashtags feeds blocking users speaking in other languages 😑
It seems that the hashtags feed doesn’t care about language preferences… Or the users posting don’t follow the language rules or whatever.
It’s probably users not setting their posts’ language properly.
Yeah, and I am the one suffering blocking everyone lol.
I use that to my advantage, being bilingual i follow ongoings in my country of origin plus locally where I’m living now.
I never really liked the microblog ecosystem in general, and some of these terrible design ideas are copied by the Twitter clones, such as how a conversation is presented in a way that is not actually in a chronological order making it hard to tell who is responding to what.
It feels like it wasn’t intended for actual engagement and discussion. It’s made so you can blast your thoughts out into the net and then get the feel good brain chemicals seeing a number next to it go up. We certainly didn’t need an entirely new system for that, since there was already plenty of places to say stupid shit and seek validation.
Yeah, I think I agree with you tbh
I never liked Twitter and don’t like Mastodon. It’s just a fundamentally flawed platform. But I’m glad it exists for those people.
basically I never follow any feed (be it Mastodon, RSS, Lemmy, newsletters, whatever) that is too high volume. If something is sending too much content I’ll just unsubscribe/unfollow. So for instance Lemmy communities for news are soo overwhelming, I’d rather sign up for a newsletter with a selection of five or so important news for the day.
I put the noisy stuff in lists that don’t show up in my home feed. That way I can catch up on home, or open a topical feed when I’m looking to scroll more.
This so much. Lists make content filtering so much easier, both foot organizing as well as for filtering.
People keep givibg thé advice of following hashtags. That light ne good advice for really obscure ones where you’re almost guaranteed to be interested in anything posted, but I think it’s terrible advice generally.
Follow users, and hide their boosts or unfollow them if it turns out they make your feed less interesting.
If you follow a generic hashtag it quickly becomes too much, what I do is follow people and very niche hashtags that I know it won’t bring that much content into the feed but that I’m interested in.
Because some accounts like to spam on certain hashtags, I had the best results with muting an account the second I thought it was annoying. It’s nothing personal, I just don’t want to see their posts on my timeline anymore, which is what mute accomplishes
This is key to a calm timeline on Mastodon (as it was on Twitter): Mute accounts liberally — and mute hashtags as well. There will be a maddening amount of noise, and since there is no algorithm on Mastodon, it’s up to yourself to focus in the important stuff.
On all microblogging platforms, I just follow people and periodically pare it back to something manageable. The sweet spot for me is following 200 or so people where a handful post all the time (and are fun and smart) but most are just friendly people, experts who don’t have poster’s madness (but add a lot when they do post). And some bots here and there for weather or breaking news but I’m very selective there. (I only want breaking news alerts that are actionable like, “A natural disaster happened.” and not 20 posts a day about political drama.)
That strategy has worked for me since the days of Twitter. It ensures there’s content for me to read when I’m playing with my phone but not so much that I’m unable to keep track of it all.
[goes on mastadon]
random opinions:
Not saying I don’t go in for it sometimes. But its a bit like Twitter. It feels like an entire auditorium talking all at once, to everyone, all at once.