Thanks a lot for your time to engage.

the fact that you can’t identify imperialism and how social democracy came to be and how it was replaced with neoliberalism

Just to be sure I understand, are you saying, I don’t explain the evolution of society and how we arrived to this model? I actually based my work on the theory of Marcel Gauchet, on the “The Disenchantment of the World”, my opinion is that neoliberalism emerged as the easiest consensus we found to replace the vacuum of religion.

I value all views and criticism, but:

just makes it not worth the time.

Is kind of dismissive and really opinionated, because you think your opinion is of more value than mine, you dismiss any chance for me to understand you or to explain myself.

I don’t deny it at all!

you have by nature often one that is leading and others that prefer (or not) to follow

I actually try to take that into account when I am speaking about sociological profile and say:

So what does it tell us? It tells us we need to stop our autonomy and individualism nonsense. Because there are different sociological profiles, some people, like my father, have no interest in essayism, in critical thinking, in innovating or exploring new ideas. They want to sign a simple social contract that makes their life easier in exchange for their physical labour. End of the line.

But I respect your choice of not going deeper into critical thinking, thanks for you time!

No need to be sorry, you are welcome!

Isn’t the link (click on the title of the post) working?

Oh no it’s in the paper it’s two section:

1. A Citizen’s Perspective: An Anthropological Essay
2. Concrete Proposition For The Digital Industry: EuroStack Consortium