That was an example usecase, an MVP, to show it works and can communicate via the fediverse.

Comments from the post I linked:

The idea is that every fungi-node also has a UI, yes. So you would be able to browse the AI models - for example if you chat with bot A, and the bot is currently learning with bot B and C, those bots would be visible to you and you could open their UI, too. And it should also show bots with which it trained earlier, too.

This way you could “browse” the resulting AI web via the browser.

Well, its similar to a botnet, but one that is open and transparent. You can browse the different nodes, etc. And you can (at least hopefully in the future) add your own computing resources to the network to participate in the AI training.

There was a post about this project a month ago, the @blue_berry@lemmy.world added some more info in the comments: https://lemmy.world/post/25493555

The formatting of the bot’s posts are messed up. Add a new line after the link. Links are not even working on there, 404 all, the number of the next line are added to the end of the url.

Some clients can convert the user handles to link, but the default webui can’t, but you can work it around and make it an instance independent link this way:

[@hatnix@social.tchncs.de](/u/hatnix@social.tchncs.de)

Rendered: @hatnix@social.tchncs.de

Its a repostt of a ~2 years old post, when lemmy reached 1 million

On a surface you should use the surface kernel and its patches: https://github.com/linux-surface/linux-surface

If I were you I would pick one from the well documented distros from its wiki: https://github.com/linux-surface/linux-surface/wiki/Installation-and-Setup#surface-kernel-installation

Obviously it should be possible to install this on any distro, but you can save yourself from a headache if you just follow a tutorial, if you have never done such a thing.

Usually it’s easier if you have the same distro on both of your computers, so you don’t have to think about which computer are you on, it’s simpler if everything is the same. All the same programs available, same repos, etc.

From the post:

But first question, as someone who isn’t tech inclined and tinkering […] that runs out of the box without me having to install additional software manually or at least automatic setup wizards because like hardware

Don’t recommend Arch to users who doesn’t want to tinker please. I know, I use Arch. Arch regularly requires user intervention, you should see them on the news: https://archlinux.org/news/ You can see, 3-4 times a year you have to fiddle with some settings, otherwise you can get an unbootable system.

And that’s how we get “the (unrealistic) expectation I had of Linux was all command line stuff and techno babble.”