Ubuntu’s current LTS version (24.04) contains ffmpeg version 7:6.1.1-3ubuntu5 which has this buffer overflow vulnerability:

https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10952

https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-32230

On my only Ubuntu computer, my update widget says that I need to upgrade to ffmpeg version 7:6.1.1-3ubuntu5+esm2 but can only only do so with Ubuntu Pro. I’m not eligible for Ubuntu Pro.

Ubuntu claims that 24.04 is currently fully supported, and should have complete security updates. However, they seem to have paywalled this security update.

What should I do?

  • commander@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    However, Ubuntu started a service called Ubuntu Pro / ESM that provides updates for packages in universe.

    Since it’s all free software, what gives Ubuntu the privilege to restrict these updates behind paywalls and signups?

    Pro is also free for personal use on up to 5 machines, so there’s no reason not to enable it.

    Fuck that bullshit. We shouldn’t be encouraging or enabling this behavior at all.

    • Leaflet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Canonical is making the security patches.

      Also, you don’t have to release your source code changes to the public. You only have to release your changes to those who have access to the product.

      That being said, Canonical probably does release the source code changes for their security fixes, I just don’t know where.

    • Noa Himesaka@lemmy.funami.tech
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      GPL does not restrict you from selling the software, though you can’t stop getting distributed by someone who bought it. Even RMS himself sold Emacs back in the day.

      EDIT: I’m not saying it’s justified in moral sense, I think it sucks ass. But it’s not against the license.

      • commander@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        GPL does not restrict you from selling the software

        Oh god, we know.

        Practically speaking though, if anyone can redistribute it for free then it’s available for free.

        • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          You don’t seem to understand the difference between free as in freedom and free as in beer that is literally the cornerstone of the free software community.